|
Page 1 of 13
Research and analyses about commodity investments have resonated among investors hungry for alternative sources of return. Financial journalists, as well as sales desks across Wall Street, have worked hard to interpret the findings and catch the eyes and ears of investors. The result has been an explosion in demand for commodity-linked vehicles among individual investors and large institutional funds alike.
Product providers, never far behind such a groundswell, have scrambled to design and deliver instruments offering attractive opportunities in exchange for the tide of commissions and fees. Commodities, it seems, are delivering results: They have demonstrated spectacular performance in recent years; they have a low historical correlation with other asset classes; they may offer a hedge against inflation; and they may even hedge against certain business and political risks.
In many cases, such findings serve as the motivating force encouraging participants to make the leap into commodities, despite potential stumbling blocks like the recent pullback in commodity prices and the spectacular collapse of market participants such as Amaranth. Whether or not any of these findings are appropriate and sustainable when applied to a real-world portfolio has become a multibillion-dollar debate.
Once the commodity investment decision has been made, however, investors are then faced with the prospect of directing their capital into the growing universe of commodity-linked vehicles. This is not an easy task. Although many of the products appear similar, they can be quite varied in their risks and rewards.
Investors would be well-served in understanding the detailed workings of the various products before such an investment decision is made, as such an understanding will help guide them to an investment decision that is both appropriate and executable.
Unfortunately, many investors in this burgeoning space leap before they look. The effort to analyze commodity-linked vehicles and make the necessary distinctions between and among them has trailed far behind the product development cycle and accompanying marketing push. As in many other markets, the effort has been overshadowed by the need for immediate market participation.
Product distinctions are important and complex, and therefore worthy of deeper exploration. This article seeks to close the information gap by identifying a framework for classifying different categories of commodity-linked vehicles, and then analyzing the construction and implication of each instrument. This type of product-level information is critical for investors to make informed decisions about how to best develop and implement their commodity market decisions.
|
