November / December 2007
Correlation

IN THIS ISSUE
 


 
Articles          
That Was Then, This Is Now
Written by John Bogle, David Blitzer, Kathleen Moriarty, Floyd Norris and Robert Shiller   
Monday, 01 October 2007 00:00  |  Related ETFs: DIG / DON / SAW


Wiandt: Well, don't you give an example in your book about graduate students?

Shiller: Yes, human capital is the most important risk; it's the most important thing that we have. And each of us is investing in human capital throughout our lives. That is the most important investment we make. And so when we make those investments, we are conscious of the risks, and so anything that lowers the level of risks to our overall picture will allow us to make more aggressive human capital investments. Right now, we're timid about these things because we're afraid that we might lose it; we have no protection. So the more complete we can make risk management, the better.

One thing that Americans have is a spirit of innovation and entrepreneurship, and I think that risk management frees us up to indulge in that more. We want excitement in our lives—we don't want to get rid of that—but we want to get rid of the risks that inhibit us from taking creative movements.

Bogle: I think each time you make the index a smaller portion—I'm talking about the indexes that are now out in the ETF field, which seem to get narrower and narrower—you're offering more choices. We know that the investor is his or her own worst enemy. In the last 10 years, the average mutual fund in the market grew at about 10 percent a year. And the average mutual fund investor putting money into the wrong funds at the top, getting out at the wrong time, putting nothing in at the beginning of the bull market and pouring money in at the end, had a return, believe this or not, of about 3 percent. So in the last 10 years, if you compound those two mutual fund numbers, that 10 percent grows to 125 percent of whatever the number is that is being compounded, and that 3 percent grows to 30 percent. And that has something to do, I think, with how we look at risk.

I look at the stock market, I think correctly, as in the long run having very, very low risk. Because my view of investing is that you own the business, it has the capital, and that capital will ultimately grow over an investment lifetime. And when the market went down 50 percent in 1973 and '74, and 50 percent in 2000 and 2002, it doesn't even matter. You've got all this money at the end of the period, and you just put blinders on and ignore these foolish fluctuations. What the stock market is, quoting Shakespeare I think, is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. And when you think about the daily machinations of the stock market … that's probably an understatement.



 

Latest comments on this feature


Post a Comment

Comment
(Limit 2,000
characters) 
*
Name: *
E-mail: *
Home page:

(optional)

Type in the displayed characters:
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address
 
 
   
 

 
 
Be up-to-date


SEARCH IN JOURNAL OF INDEXES



 

 
Copyright Index Publications LLC 2009