News
PowerShares Cuts Fees On Six ETFs
November 29, 2012
|
Invesco PowerShares, the fund provider best known for its Nasdaq-100 ETF (NasdaqGM: QQQ), is slashing fees on six of its ETFs—some by as much as 42 percent—in an effort to make the funds more alluring to investors. Among the ETFs are four funds linked to Rob Arnott’s fundamentals-driven RAFI methodology, including the PowerShares FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Portfolio (NYSEArca: PXH), which now costs only 0.49 percent, or 42 percent less than it did before at 0.85 percent. Up to now, PowerShares has not been a part of the ongoing ETF fee war among fund providers that already saw Charles Schwab, Vanguard and, most recently, iShares take measures to increase their ETFs’ competitiveness by lowering expense ratios. The fee cuts were effective Nov. 21, the company said in a press release on Thursday. “We believe the lower fees announced today better align the six funds with our existing offerings, and help position the PowerShares family of ETFs for continued growth,” Ben Fulton, managing director of global ETFs for Invesco PowerShares, said in the press release. The other five affected ETFs, including the three additional RAFI-linked strategies are:
Two of the firm’s 12 factor-driven ETFs were also part of the fee cuts, both linked to S&P indexes. They are:
Emerging Markets Funds The cut on the emerging markets fund PXH gives the fund the upper hand in terms of cost relative to the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (NYSEArca: EEM)—the grandfather of all emerging market ETFs. EEM costs 0.67 percent. Despite being on the market for nearly five years, the $350 million PXH remains a relatively small player in an emerging market equities segment populated by heavyweights like the $38 billion EEM or even the $56 billion Vanguard MSCI Emerging Market ETF (NYSEArca: VWO), which costs 0.20 percent. The fee cuts suggest that Arnott, the architect behind the fundamentally focused RAFI index screens, may be having something of a change of heart with regardto pricing. After all, in an interview with IndexUniverse last summer, Arnott said when it came to fees, the relatively high expense ratios charged for RAFI-linked ETFs were more than justified by the extra return the RAFI methodology often produces.
|
FINRA’s Wrongheaded Ruling On Backtesting
A FINRA ruling on backtesting for new ETFs serves as a reminder of how not to invest.KraneShares China Bond ETF To Stand Out
In the young and as-yet-undeveloped ‘dim sum’ bond market, the upstart ETF firm KraneShares looks for a niche.VXX May Be Losing Its Hedging Mojo
Using VIX-based ETPs to hedge equity positions has never been easy or cheap. Is it now less effective too?
|
|
|
|
The SEC And Gold Miners
Paul and Ugo discuss the rumors surrounding the SEC's new approach to passive ETFs and whether investors have learned any lessons from the recent moves in gold.
See All

