MacroShares Alters Leverage On Home Prices ETFs
February 17, 2009 11:03 am
|
Are more teeter-totter exchange-traded funds on the way? If approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, they'll certainly have a bit more juice. MacroMarkets has submitted a revised prospectus for its request to the SEC to offer two new funds. Much like earlier versions of MacroShares that gave investors a different sort of way to play the oil markets, the new ETFs will have an "up" and a "down" version. That has commonly been referred to as a "teeter-totter" type of approach to investing. This time, MacroShares is targeting U.S. home prices. (See related article here.) "The major difference we're making in the amendments is that we've gone from having each fund provide two-times leverage to three-times leverage," said Sam Masucci, MacroMarkets' chief executive. The changes also include shortening the terms on each fund from 10-years to five-years. The new Macros will give investors their first chance to trade or hedge home prices using ETFs. The funds will provide both inverse and leveraged exposure to home prices:
A date for an auction has yet to be set, says Masucci. "We anticipate the auction to be sometime in April," he said. "But that's going to be dependent on the SEC's approval of our product." The expense ratios for each ETF is expected to be 1.25% per year. The estimated price range for the securities is between $28 and $42 per share in the 10-day auction process, according to the new filings. -- This article was submitted by IndexUniverse's Murray Coleman.
Are m |
-
[News] December 23, 2009
Goldman Sachs To Launch ETFs -
[News] December 22, 2009
Claymore Filing: Equal-Weighting The Wilshire 5000? -
[News] December 17, 2009
UUP Halts Creations As Demand Surges -
[News] December 30, 2009
WisdomTree Launches Dollar-Hedged Int'l ETF -
[News] December 27, 2009
IndexIQ Perfect On Cap Gains Results

Passive-Aggressive Shenanigans?
The new S&P Index vs. Active report is out. It might be a game changer, if you can cut through the spin.
BABs: Beautiful If You’re Not Rich
Despite the Wall Street Journal’s worries about Build America Bonds, they can be great for your portfolio, especially if you’re not super-wealthy.
|
|
|
|









