New Multifactored Index Funds: Too Complex?
June 22, 2009 10:17 am
|
Some time back, Dow Jones Indexes teamed up with research and asset management firm Transparent Value LLC to create the Dow Jones Transparent Value RBP Indexes. Now, a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking a green light to launch three index mutual funds using Transparent Value’s proprietary “required business performance” methodology. The filing covers three index mutual funds: the Transparent Value Dow Jones RBP U.S. Large-Cap 100 High-Beta Leading Index Fund; the Transparent Value Dow Jones RBP U.S. Large-Cap 100 Low-Beta Leading Index Fund; and the Transparent Value Dow Jones RBP U.S. Large-Cap 100 Market-Beta Leading Index Fund. Essentially, Transparent Value’s RBP methodology attempts to establish the revenue levels a company must generate to justify its stock price. From there, it calculates the “RBP probability” of the company achieving that goal. The indexes underlying the proposed funds are derived from the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, which has approximately 750 components. The RBP methodology is applied to each one, and the stocks are also evaluated for price momentum and “beta,” or the volatility of the stock relative to the market’s volatility, which is set at a score of 1. The top 50% of stocks in the original universe in terms of RBP probability and momentum are eligible for inclusion in all three of the underlying indexes. The 400 stocks with scores closest to 1.0 are eligible for inclusion in the “Market Beta” fund’s underlying index, while stocks with scores above or below 1.0 are eligible for inclusion in the "High Beta” and “Low Beta” funds’ indexes, respectively. Components are weighted in each of the indexes according to their RBP probabilities. If it sounds complex, that’s because it is. The underlying indexes are much closer to the multifactored fundamentally weighted indexes of the FTSE/RAFI index family than the cap-weighted S&P 500. The question is whether investors will be turned off by the complex index methodology paired with a passive investment strategy. The filing did not include fees or expenses associated with the funds. You can read the filing here.
|
-
[BLOG IU.COM] December 21, 2009
Let’s Make A Deal On 12b-1 Fees If we’re going to allow 12b-1 fees, let’s make sure fund companies actually pass on the savings to investors. -
[Column/Features] December 28, 2009
The Case For Defense ETFs Investors should think of investing in the aerospace and defense sector as allocating to insurance. Insurance on the country, that is. -
[News] December 23, 2009
Goldman Sachs To Launch ETFs -
[BLOG IU.COM] December 22, 2009
A Christmas Wish For ETFs No, not my two front teeth. What I want for Christmas is better ETF education. -
[News] December 22, 2009
Claymore Filing: Equal-Weighting The Wilshire 5000?

All Charts Lie
The entire pretense of technical analysis, trend-following, moving averages and charting is based on a lie. It’s time to pull the wool back from the eyes of Wall Street.
Passive-Aggressive Shenanigans?
The new S&P Index vs. Active report is out. It might be a game changer, if you can cut through the spin.
|
|
|
|









