PowerShares Plans To Globalize PSP's Portfolio
August 13, 2009 7:01 am
|
In May, Invesco PowerShares announced the closing of 19 different exchange-traded funds. One of those was a fund investing strictly in foreign private-equity players, apparently due to low asset levels. Now, PowerShares is proposing changes to its existing private-equity ETF. It has filed a request with the Securities and Exchange Commission for approval to what appears to be a conversion of the U.S.-focused PowerShares Listed Private Equity ETF (NYSE Arca: PSP) into a global portfolio. In 2006, PSP came out as the first ETF of its kind. At the time, the market for public private-equity firms was somewhat limited, causing some investors to grouse that PSP had to stretch its portfolio a bit and include companies that shouldn't be considered pure private equity plays. But in late 2007, the PowerShares International Listed Private Equity Portfolio (NYSE Arca: PFP) was launched. It came out just as credit markets were tanking and valuations of once-booming private equity firms began tumbling. By the time PowerShares decided to pull the plug earlier this year, PFP had just $12.6 million in assets. (See related story here.) Presumably, a switch to a more global portfolio would combine the top names in the existing holdings of PSP and the former PFP using a modified market-cap size weighting methodology. No details of a new index were given in the filing, however. It might be worth noting that PSP currently charges an expense ratio of 0.60%. After the changes, PSP will include some 40-60 different companies involved in lending or investing in privately held companies throughout the world. PSP is certainly having a banner year after suffering a huge fall in 2008. The domestic-minded ETF lost more than 64% last year, but has gained 22%-plus so far in 2009. You can read the filing here.
|
12b-1 Fees: Who Cares When You Have ETFs?
I don’t really disagree with your outrage regarding 12b-1 fees, Matt, but I think you missed a bigger point.SEC Punts On 12b-1 Fees
Your article today on 12b-1 fees is way too soft on the Securities and Exchange Commission, Olly.
|
|
|
|


