- LOGIN
- |
- REGISTER
- |
- RSS
- |
- IU IN THE NEWS
- |
- ABOUT US
- |
- CONTACT
- |
- IndexUniverse.eu
Sections
A Tale Of Two Benchmarks
June 23, 2009
|
Page 1 of 7
The role of a benchmark is to represent the return to an investment strategy in an investment universe. Active managers’ skills can be distinguished from random results by comparing their investment returns to a benchmark that represents their investment universe. In general, a benchmark represents a return to a passive strategy. If benchmarks are assumed to represent a passive strategy in a given investment universe, then returns among various benchmarks should be similar. This similarity appears to be the case in the U.S. large-cap equity universe, by looking at how the returns on the Russell 1000® and the S&P 500® Index closely track each other. However, in the small-cap universe, returns between the Russell 2000 and the S&P SmallCap 600 are significantly different. Using monthly total returns from 1994¬2008, Exhibit 1 charts the growth of an investment of US$ 1 in the S&P 500 and Russell 1000, and in the S&P SmallCap 600 and Russell 2000.
Exhibit 1. Cumulative Return On Investments
Source: Standard & Poor’s, Frank Russell
In the U.S. large-cap universe, US$ 1 invested in the S&P 500 and the Russell 1000 from December 1993-December 2008 would have returned US$ 2.63 and US$ 2.67, respectively. Conversely, US$ 1 invested in the S&P SmallCap 600 and the Russell 2000 over the same investment horizon would have returned US$ 3.06 and US$ 2.38, respectively. Since its launch in 1994, the S&P SmallCap 600 has outperformed the Russell 2000 in 11 out of the 15 years. From January 1994 through May 2009, the S&P SmallCap 600 returns exceeded those of the Russell 2000 by about 2% per year. Exhibit 2 highlights the risk/return profile of the two indices.
Exhibit 2. Risk/Return Profile
Source: Standard & Poor’s, Frank Russell. Data from January 1994 – May 2009.
The substantial divergence of returns between the two small-cap indices merits further study, and an understanding of the factors contributing to the divergence. In this paper, we examine the sources of the return differential.
|
Round Two: Pimco Vs. BlackRock
It looks like Pimco and BlackRock are at odds again—this time it’s over QE3.Is The Cheapest ETF The Best?
State Street recently lowered the expense ratios on its sector SPDRs to 0.18 percent, making them once again the cheapest U.S. sector ETFs around.-
VelocityShares Adds 8 Commodities ETNs
February 08, 2012 1:08 pm -
UNG Sets 4-For-1 Reverse Share Split
February 06, 2012 8:48 pm -
iShares Plans Multi-Asset Fund-Of-Funds ETF
February 06, 2012 8:31 pm -
iShares Launches Asia ETF, Minus Japan
February 03, 2012 12:33 pm -
iShares Lists India ETF On BATS Exchange
February 03, 2012 10:57 am
|
|
|
|
Socializing About The Social Media ETF
Paul Baiocchi joins Dave Nadig to talk about where theme funds go astray, and why SOCL might just be the exception.
See All

Previous Page


